A Representation Theorem for Preferential Logics
نویسندگان
چکیده
This paper shows how to deene nonmonotonic logics from any classical logics L and any set X of formulas of L. In this context, the nonmonotonic inference relation`X is deened by A ` X B if every classical theorem of A B which is in X is a theorem of A. The properties of the relation`X are studied. We show, in particular, that the elementary properties (supraclassicity, or, left logical equivalence, cut, etc.) are veriied for any X. Moreover, we prove that cumulativity is veriied if the set of formulas of the language, which are not in X, is deductively closed. Then we prove a representation theorem, i.e., in the nite case every preferential nonmonotonic logic is an X-logic. We also study a particular form of the set X for propositional circumscription.
منابع مشابه
The Remak-Krull-Schmidt Theorem on\ Fuzzy Groups
In this paper we study a representation of a fuzzy subgroup $mu$ of a group $G$, as a product of indecomposable fuzzy subgroups called the components of $mu$. This representation is unique up to the number of components and their isomorphic copies. In the crisp group theory, this is a well-known Theorem attributed to Remak, Krull, and Schmidt. We consider the lattice of fuzzy subgroups and som...
متن کاملEQ-logics with delta connective
In this paper we continue development of formal theory of a special class offuzzy logics, called EQ-logics. Unlike fuzzy logics being extensions of theMTL-logic in which the basic connective is implication, the basic connective inEQ-logics is equivalence. Therefore, a new algebra of truth values calledEQ-algebra was developed. This is a lower semilattice with top element endowed with two binary...
متن کاملPreferential Reasoning for Modal Logics
Modal logic is the foundation for a versatile and well-established class of knowledge representation formalisms in artificial intelligence. Enriching modal logics with non-monotonic reasoning capabilities such as preferential reasoning as developed by Lehmann and colleagues would therefore constitute a natural extension of such KR formalisms. Nevertheless, there is at present no generally accep...
متن کاملSemantic Foundation for Preferential Description Logics
Description logics are a well-established family of knowledge representation formalisms in Artificial Intelligence. Enriching description logics with non-monotonic reasoning capabilities, especially preferential reasoning as developed by Lehmann and colleagues in the 90’s, would therefore constitute a natural extension of such KR formalisms. Nevertheless, there is at present no generally accept...
متن کاملMonotonicity and Persistence in Preferential
An important characteristic of many logics for Arti cial Intelligence is their nonmonotonicity. This means that adding a formula to the premises can invalidate some of the consequences. There may, however, exist formulae that can always be safely added to the premises without destroying any of the consequences: we say they respect monotonicity. Also, there may be formulae that, when they are a ...
متن کامل